Alternative
Hacker Bot vs Beagle Security
AI-powered automated penetration testing with low false positives. How does it stack up against Hacker Bot?
TL;DR
Both Beagle Security and Hacker Bot offer AI-enhanced automated pentesting at accessible price points. Beagle focuses on dashboard-driven workflows with a free tier. Hacker Bot emphasizes GitHub-native integration with proof-of-exploit evidence.
Choose Beagle if you want a free tier and dashboard-focused testing.
Choose Hacker Bot if GitHub PR annotations are your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hacker Bot | Beagle |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $59/mo | ~$119/mo |
| Free Tier | Free Trial | Basic surface scans |
| GitHub Integration | Native PR annotations | CI/CD available |
| API Testing | REST, GraphQL | REST, GraphQL (higher tiers) |
| Business Logic | Automated discovery | Recording in higher tiers |
| Proof of Exploit | Yes, with evidence | Low false positive focus |
| Workflow Focus | GitHub-first | Dashboard + CI/CD |
| Target Audience | Developers | SMB security teams |
✓ Where Beagle Shines
- • Transparent pricing tiers accessible for SMBs
- • AI-driven with focus on low false positives
- • Free plan available for basic testing
- • Authenticated testing and automated pentest flows
✗ Where Beagle Falls Short
- • API/GraphQL scanning only in higher tiers
- • Less deeply integrated into code workflows
- • Dashboard-centric rather than PR-centric
- • Pricing can vary across sources
Choose Beagle If...
- → You want to start with a free tier
- → Dashboard workflows work for you
- → You're an SMB security team
- → Authenticated testing is priority
Choose Hacker Bot If...
- → GitHub is your primary workflow
- → You want PR-native security feedback
- → Proof-of-exploit evidence matters
- → Developer experience is priority
Security in Your PR
Get security findings where you already work—GitHub.
No credit card required • Free Trial included